Let the Dead be Baptized

April 20, 2012

"Normal Dan" Dan Liechty

Recently there was a minor uproar when people learned that it is a practice of the Church of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) to “baptize the dead.” Although this practice is supposed to be limited to the direct bloodline ancestors of Mormon people (thus assuring that those of their ancestral line will be assured of salvation in the afterlife) the practice apparently has expanded (without official sanction from the church hierarchy) to include others as well. This was seen to be particularly offensive to Jewish people and others who felt that this posthumous “claim” of people for Mormonism is a breach of the American “truce” between religions on which our particular brand of tolerance is based.

I have some strong feelings about this situation myself, but have purposely waited until the hubbub has died down a bit before expressing them publically. I think we can well assume that if Mitt Romney indeed becomes the Republican presidential candidate, we will hear about all of this again in the course of the campaign. Therefore, now seems like a good time to express what I have to say about it.

All religions have their way of remembering and honoring the dead. There is nothing about this that should be discouraged. Most of the time, the rituals of remembering and honoring are expressed in prayers. I am not an expert on all Jewish practices, but in the services of my own (Reform) congregation, the Mourners’ Kaddish, the prayer for the dead, is the culmination of the service itself. Most of the time, those mentioned specifically by name in this part of the service are Jewish people. However, that is not always the case. We are a congregation in which a very high percentage of the marriages are “mixed,” meaning one of the partners does not come from a Jewish background (this is very typical for Reform, Reconstruction and Conservative congregations, less so for Orthodox congregations but rising even there.) If a person requests the name of a non-Jewish relative to be mentioned during this part of the service, there is no objection at all, at least in my congregation. That a non-Jewish person’s name is included in this part of the service is a sign of deep respect and a signal that we are all connected as one human family, regardless of religion or ethnic origins.

Clearly, in every religious service in the country you will find similar ritual inclusions of people who are not members of that religion themselves. I can hardly imagine anyone with any sense objecting to having others mentioned in prayer or other rituals who are not members of that particular faith.

So, apparently, in demonstrating their remembrance and honor for people no longer with us in body, Mormons include not only prayer but baptism in their rituals of respect. Thought experiment. Most of us, I think, would be positively touched to learn that local Mormon congregants had mentioned our recently deceased parent or close relative in prayer. I think this would be true even if we did not particularly believe in the efficacy of prayer itself–we would recognize in any case that such prayer was a signal of respect. Why would we feel any different then, if we do, to learn that in addition to prayer for our deceased parent or close relative, there had also been a ritual baptism?

I think this would be because in our own Christian churches, baptism is associated with inauguration of membership, and so it may feel like Mormons are “claiming” as members those who did not, in life, wish to be members. However, we should keep in mind that the “offense” occurs only because we are reading our own understanding of the meaning of baptism into the Mormon practice. But this is not legitimate. If as part of a service emphasizing Christian love, a minister claimed Gandhi as an “honorary Presbyterian,” of Lutheran, or Baptist, or what have you, would that be so offensive? I think not, and I suggest that the Mormon practice of baptism for the dead is no more than that–a sign of remembrance, honor and respect.

Now, baptism of deceased Jewish people has some different undertones. There is a long history in Jewish and Christian history of “forced” baptisms, of living Jewish people being baptized against their will, and we honor in memory those many Jews who chose fines, exile, and even death, rather than to submit to Christian baptism. To learn that Anne Frank and other Holocaust victims have been ritually “baptized” in Mormon memorial services cannot be easily separated from the feelings associated with centuries of forced Christian baptism. Because of this, such baptisms should never be done in the public arena (which Mormons would never do in any case) and it would be good if Mormons did not publicize the specifics of this ritual. But Mormons have never forced baptism on living Jewish people, and so again it is not right to impute the same motives of those who forced baptism on living Jewish people onto Mormons. Baptism of the dead is an inner-church Mormon ritual signaling remembrance, honor and respect for those being symbolically included in the ritual.

If and when discussion of this practice hits the public airwaves again, as it surely will during a Romney run for President, I would hope we can all just chill out a bit, and put this practice in the same context as prayer for the deceased. Building tolerance for each other is anything but easy, so let us not suspicion each other about the rituals we employ for rituals intending remembrance, honor and respect.



  1. I disagree with Dan. As a liberal reform Jew, I feel that the Mormon gesture is offensive. It imposes a “rider’ on my religious identity with the implication that my salvation may depend upon it. I find it patronizing and insulting for another religion to redefine the context of my passing in the name of protecting my afterlife–about which I have no belief or expectation, and maybe don’t want one. I can brush it off, so to speak, but empathize with those who are outraged. Jim L

    • Thanks Dan, for clarification. Marilyn P.

  2. I think I am going to disagree here as well. When I die, I would be fine, as would you apparently, with friends and family saying a prayer for me – their doing so does not require me to have believed in their faith or to have been baptized; if it brings them comfort, then so be it. But I feel that there is something different with a formal gesture that is meant to bring the name of the dead within the holy fold of a religious doctrine against what might have been their living will. It means that a person’s life, name, and memory, which may have represented a willing resistance or denouncing of religion, can now be forced, in their death, to extol what they did not in life. Unless I misunderstand something here, I think it can be rightly viewed, I think, as a sign of disrespect for what that person stood for.

  3. Please bear in mind, I am not ADVOCATING this practice, I am only suggesting that shouold try to interpret it as generously as possible. Normal Dan

  4. …”Baptism of the dead is an inner-church Mormon ritual signaling remembrance, honor and respect for those being symbolically included in the ritual.”…

    No, it isn’t. It is a rescue mission. Mormons believe that ONLY Mormons go to the “good place” when they pass on. How much of a “good place” anyplace can be if it’s full of Mormons and empty of cold beer and hot coffee is another question entirely.
    I find it terribly insulting. There is no honor and respect here. It is the equivalent of a Rabbi circumcising the dead.

    …”Most of us, I think, would be positively touched to learn that a local Rabbi had gone to the funeral parlor and circumcised our recently deceased father or close male relative.”… [NOT]

  5. Thanks, Dan, for writing such a thoughtful piece and for framing this issue in a way that I hope non-Mormons can better relate to. As a Mormon myself, I think you have captured very well the intent of our church members when we perform baptisms for the dead. It is only ever intended to honor them and bless them — never to coerce or impose our beliefs on others. When we perform a baptism for the dead, we understand that the individual’s spirit is still living, and he (or she) will choose whether to accept the baptism performed on his behalf. Since he can’t communicate with us now, we perform the baptism not knowing what his choice will be. But in all things, we respect his choice.

    Your writing also helped me better understand why others — particularly among the Jewish community — have difficulty with our practices here. I never considered how baptism for the dead might recall a history of forced baptisms and religious oppression. These historical acts are repugnant to me as well, and not at all what we are doing when we perform a baptism for the dead. But thank you for helping me better understand the perspectives and emotions of others related to our practices. This can only help foster mutual respect among all of us.

  6. As a Catholic, there is one important thing to remember. Mormonism has occult roots and there is no validity to their
    “Baptism”…it is an empty gesture. It is not founded on Christian
    teaching. It is really the Church of Joseph Smith, NOT the
    Church of Jesus Christ. So don’t worry, God knows who we are and what we have chosen and respects our free will.

    • I’m not sure how the “Church of Joseph Smith” is any less valid than the “Church of Jesus Christ”.

      They are both based on hocus-pocus. Rising from the dead? Ya, right … let me get right on that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: